In this new century that the World has experienced remarkable changes not only in its political structure but also in its own cultural, economical, and spiritual facets. Democracy dropped in only a dozen nations in the previous century, and, in most of these instances, it happened after some kind of bloody coupe-de-troit political procedure. Many of these governments collapsed in less than a decade, often as a result of insufficient political will or intense corruption in their respective societies. Before this century ends, there are still communist countries in China, North Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba, which have repressed their inhabitants with an iron hand.
What has occurred in these political transitions? Why is it that democracy has lost its validity? How do we know that the collapse of democracy as a result of mass political conflicts? The answers lie in philosophy, however, one of the most essential regions is in world affairs. A number of explanations for the decline of democratic institutions in several nations was given by leading intellectuals during the previous century.
In this new century that the World has experienced remarkable changes
According to some of these thinkers, democratic transition meant a step apart from constitutionalism toward a constitutional state. They claimed the democratization meant the ending of a popular will and mass movements, with all their attendant horrors. Others held that the rapid spread of democratic institutions in one country threatened to destroy individual liberty, which in itself was an obstacle to democracy. Exotic philosopher Karl Popper wrote that Machiavellian”ideals” made possible”a sort of intellectual captivity,” leading to”the concept that the will of man is no guiding principle.” He further explained that Machiavellian ideals lead unavoidably to”tyrannical rule,” leading to”anarchy and death.”
In World History, many theories about the causes of democracy have been invented. Among the very influential came from the French thinker Malevere who implied that democratic associations fostered a spirit of liberty and prosperity that made people more eager to participate in collective venture. Others indicated that the spread of democracy through contemporary society supported a liberal attitude on issues like sexual and behavioral practices. Still others blamed the downfall of ancient Roman democracy on the coming of the”tyranny” of the wealthy upper class and the intellectual elite that controlled the government. Regardless of what the critics thought, nearly all believed the reduction of democratic associations resulted in greater amounts of corruption, crime, warfare and other evils.
How did things change? Some thought that democratic institutions could not resist the pressures from within, particularly after the First World War. Others saw that economic globalization and the greater mobility of people into the urban center negated the role that leaders and aristocrats once played in providing public goods. And ultimately, the”communist regimes” of China and Cuba came into power and also altered the rules of the game, substituting freedom with complete authoritarian rule.
Now, democratic transitions happen when important political or social fragmentation took place (e.g., in Latin America, following the conclusion of the Cold War, when there have been lots of military coups and mass political demonstrations). These social fragmentation are generally linked to ethnic and religious conflicts or to ethnic or communal resentments against specific groups (for instance, ethnic-minority individuals in Latin America). Typically, democratic transition occurs just after radical governments or groups come to power when popular movements against globalization and contrary to large scale globalisation lead to political power.
How did things change? Some thought that democratic institutions could not resist the pressures from within
What about human rights protection? The promotion of human rights depends on the occurrence of a powerful and inclusive polities with commendable national and international human rights service. In most cases, when the elected authorities and the opposition haven’t established credible human rights defenders, they are unable to prevent or protect people’s rights. Moreover, many democratic transitions happen after there has been a series of major political and financial reforms and if there is a substantial progress in human welfare.
Are democratic alterations compatible with the World’s pursuits?
Are democratic alterations compatible with the World’s pursuits? Of course not! There are a number of cases where absolute political liberty is necessary, such as for states involved in civil wars or during protracted periods of war. However, the vast majority of human societies need restricted political freedom and that is why interventions in sovereign states, irrespective of their ideology, are counterproductive. In the end, if individual rights are to be protected, an assortment of democratic transition approaches must be adopted to ensure that individual and civic freedoms are protected wherever necessary. Human rights advocates must work closely together with democratic governments, nongovernmental organizations, academia and the business community in order to build support for these principles across the world.